Reviewed by the Marketing Team Last updated
A right-of-first-refusal provision in a Minnesota parenting order can require a parent who needs substitute childcare to offer that time to the other parent first. The actual wording controls when the obligation applies. Do not assume every custody order includes this right or that Minnesota imposes a universal four-, six-, or eight-hour trigger.
A well-defined provision may create useful time with a parent. A vague or impractical one can generate disputes about work, relatives, notice, and transportation. Evaluate the child’s needs and the family’s circumstances before proposing a clause.
Where does the right come from?
Start with the current order or parenting plan. Look for a provision addressing substitute care, an opportunity for additional time, or a right of first refusal. Read its definitions and exceptions together with the rest of the schedule.
Minnesota Statutes section 518.1705 addresses parenting plans, including schedules, decision-making, dispute resolution, and other agreed child-related matters. Section 518.175 governs parenting time. Neither should be read as automatically inserting a particular childcare-offer clause into every order.
Can a parent provide childcare while the other parent works?
Section 518.175, subdivision 8 allows a court to grant additional parenting time for childcare while the other parent works when the arrangement is reasonable and serves the child’s best interests. The court also considers cooperation, dispute-resolution methods and the parents’ willingness to use them, and domestic abuse.
This is a possible court-ordered arrangement, not an automatic right to replace daycare. Explain your availability, travel time, the child’s routine, and safety concerns when asking whether this option fits your family.
Which details should a proposed clause address?
- Trigger: What kind and length of absence creates an obligation to offer care?
- Covered circumstances: Does it include regular work, overnight travel, or only occasional absences?
- Exceptions: How are school, daycare, activities, relatives, household members, and emergencies treated?
- Notice: What information must be provided, by which method, and when?
- Response: How long does the other parent have to accept or decline?
- Transportation: Who handles pickup and return, and at what times?
- Default: What happens if the other parent declines, does not respond, or becomes unavailable?
- Schedule: When does the ordinary parenting schedule resume?
These are drafting questions, not mandatory terms for every Minnesota family. Avoid copying a sample clause without checking how it interacts with your order and circumstances.
How can ambiguous wording create a dispute?
Consider a hypothetical clause covering an absence “longer than six hours.” If a parent needs care for exactly six hours, the wording matters. If the clause says nothing about regular daycare or a child’s sleepover, the parents may disagree about whether those situations count.
Another problem is a notice rule that identifies the wrong person. The parent who needs substitute care ordinarily has the information necessary to make the offer; the receiving parent’s response deadline is a different issue. A clause should distinguish those responsibilities clearly.
Do not treat the example threshold as a recommended number. Choose terms based on the child’s routine and realistic logistics, with legal advice.
Does the clause apply to grandparents, stepparents, or daycare?
There is no reliable answer without the order’s language. A provision may contain an exception for employment-related care or specified caregivers; another may not. A child’s recreational visit can also raise different questions from substitute care during a parent’s absence.
Gather the exact wording and facts before alleging a violation. Avoid relying on another family’s order or another state’s guidelines as if they control your case.
When might a right of first refusal help?
Evaluate whether the other parent is actually available, whether the travel is manageable, and whether the arrangement would give the child useful time without disrupting sleep, school, or activities. Consider whether it would reduce unnecessary childcare transitions or instead create more of them.
For example, a parent living nearby who can provide an afternoon of care presents different logistics from a parent whose round trip would consume much of that afternoon. Describe those practical facts when evaluating a proposal.
What risks should parents consider?
A clause can become a source of repeated contact, surveillance, or conflict if its boundaries are unclear. It should not be assumed to create a right to monitor every aspect of the other parent’s private schedule.
Domestic abuse, threats, and unsafe exchanges require specific attention. Section 518.1705 includes protections affecting parenting-plan preparation and dispute-resolution requirements. Raise safety concerns before agreeing to new contact or exchange obligations.
Our Minnesota custody-factor guide explains the broader child-focused analysis.
What should you do if you believe the clause was violated?
Preserve the order, the date and duration of the alleged absence, relevant messages, and the response or explanation provided. Separate what you know from what you suspect.
Ask counsel whether the issue involves interpretation, compliance, or a need to change an impractical provision. Do not retaliate by withholding unrelated parenting time or taking the child outside the order. Immediate safety issues require a prompt, appropriate response rather than a routine scheduling argument.
Can an existing provision be changed?
Potentially, but the procedure and legal standard depend on the existing order and requested change. A limited parenting-time adjustment is not necessarily the same as changing custody or the child’s primary residence.
Section 518.175 addresses parenting-time modification, and section 518.1705 contains provisions for modifying parenting plans. Review the appropriate process before assuming an informal change is enforceable. Our guide to changing an existing custody arrangement explains why the type of requested relief matters.
Frequently asked questions about right of first refusal
Is right of first refusal automatic in Minnesota?
Do not assume it applies without a relevant provision. Read your current order or plan and obtain advice about any proposed addition.
Is 24 hours’ notice always required?
No universal notice period should be assumed. The provision should address foreseeable absences, response time, and unexpected circumstances in workable terms.
Does accepting extra care permanently change the schedule?
Do not assume it does. Review the clause and existing order. An opportunity to provide care is different from a permanent modification of custody or parenting time.
Must I accept every offer?
A right to be offered care is not necessarily an obligation to accept it. The actual terms matter, including how to decline and what happens next.
Review the wording before a childcare dispute develops
Martine Law PLLC provides family-law services under the Martine Law brand. Request a consultation to review an existing clause or a proposed parenting provision.
Phones and chat are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.
This page provides general information about Minnesota law, not legal advice for your particular case.
For an overview of the law and how we help, see our Minnesota child custody and parenting time page.
