Reviewed by the Marketing Team Last updated
Yes. A verbal threat can lead to arrest in Minnesota even if no physical attack occurs. But an angry or offensive statement is not automatically a crime. The particular offense, evidence, and legal authority for arrest matter; an arrest is not a finding of guilt.
What counts as threats of violence?
Minnesota Statutes section 609.713, now titled “Threats of Violence,” addresses different forms of threatening conduct. Subdivision 1 covers direct or indirect threats to commit a crime of violence, made to terrorize another, cause specified evacuations or serious public inconvenience, or with reckless disregard of those risks. It carries a maximum of five years in prison, a $10,000 fine, or both.
That maximum does not apply to every subdivision. Subdivision 2 separately addresses communications about explosives or incendiary devices at a named location and has a different maximum penalty. The complaint should identify the exact provision charged.
Does the speaker have to intend to carry it out?
The relevant mental state is not simply whether someone planned to complete a later attack. Saying “I never intended to hurt anyone” does not, by itself, answer whether the statement was a criminal threat. Counsel must examine the words, surrounding events, and the mental state required by the charged offense.
In Counterman v. Colorado (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that true-threat prosecutions require some subjective understanding of the statement’s threatening nature. The First Amendment permits a recklessness standard: conscious disregard of a substantial risk that the communication would be understood as threatening violence. A listener’s reaction alone does not resolve that requirement.
Can police arrest someone just to calm an argument?
De-escalation alone is not a substitute for lawful arrest grounds. Section 629.34 sets out circumstances permitting warrantless arrest, including specified felony circumstances and certain domestic-abuse situations supported by probable cause. Whether an officer witnessed the conduct and which offense is suspected can matter. An attorney can review the arrest report and the legal basis asserted.
How are domestic assault allegations different?
Under section 609.2242, subdivision 1, domestic assault includes an act intended to cause a family or household member to fear immediate bodily harm or death. Physical injury is not required for that form of assault. The relationship and immediacy requirements distinguish it from a general claim that words were upsetting.
Read and follow any release conditions or protective order. Ask counsel about permitted communication before contacting the other person, including through friends or social media.
What evidence should you preserve?
- Complete message threads, original voicemails, call logs, and available recordings.
- The date, location, exact words you remember, and what happened before and after.
- Witness names and information about who heard the exchange directly.
- The complaint, arrest paperwork, hearing notices, and any no-contact order.
Do not delete messages, edit recordings, or pressure a witness to change an account. Discuss disputed facts and possible constitutional defenses privately with your lawyer. If police seek an interview, you can state that you wish to remain silent and want an attorney.
Discuss a Minnesota threats allegation
Schedule a consultation with Martine Law to discuss the allegation and upcoming deadlines. Initial intake may be handled by a Director of Client Engagement (non-attorney), who gathers information and coordinates next steps. An attorney provides legal advice and case strategy. No particular result is guaranteed.
This page states Minnesota law and is for general information, not legal advice.
