Reviewed by the Marketing Team Last updated
A proposed move can require changes to a Minnesota custody order’s residence, school, parenting-time, and transportation provisions. Permission to move the child’s residence and modification of the existing order are related but distinct questions. Review the exact terms that would no longer work before asking the other parent or the court to approve a new arrangement.
This guide focuses on reviewing and updating an existing order. For the legal standard governing an out-of-state residence move, see our Minnesota custody relocation rules guide.
Which parts of the existing order should you review?
- The child’s residence and any geographic restrictions.
- Legal custody and school or medical decision-making provisions.
- The regular parenting-time calendar.
- Holidays, vacations, and school breaks.
- Exchange locations and transportation duties.
- Notice requirements and dispute-resolution provisions.
- Any protective, supervision, or no-contact restrictions.
Include amendments and incorporated parenting plans. A move may affect several provisions even when the basic custody labels remain the same.
When is consent or court permission required?
Section 518.175, subdivision 3, requires consent or court permission for the parent with whom the child resides to move the child’s residence to another state when the other parent has parenting time under the decree.
The statute provides relocation factors and a burden-of-proof rule, including a domestic-abuse provision. Do not assume a job offer, a custody label, or a promise of video calls guarantees permission.
An in-state move requires review of the order and its practical effects, even though subdivision 3 concerns another state. If the order came from elsewhere or no order exists, obtain advice about the proper legal framework.
What is the difference between relocation and custody modification?
A request to move the child’s residence does not automatically resolve every custody issue. A proposal changing legal custody, physical custody, or primary residence may require analysis under section 518.18.
Changes to parenting time may instead fall under section 518.175, depending on the requested relief. The court must apply the relevant standard; calling every requested change a “schedule adjustment” does not determine which law applies.
How should you compare the old and proposed calendars?
Prepare a side-by-side working calendar for counsel. Identify each provision that would change and the reason it no longer works.
- Regular school-week time before and after the move.
- The number and duration of trips.
- Holidays and school breaks under each calendar.
- Travel time compared with actual time together.
- How school attendance, activities, and rest are protected.
- What happens when a trip is canceled or delayed.
A calendar that looks balanced on paper may be unworkable once travel, expense, and the child’s needs are included. Use actual routes and realistic timing.
What transportation terms deserve attention?
Specify who books and pays for travel, who accompanies the child when needed, pickup and drop-off responsibilities, and notice of itinerary changes. Consider the availability and cost of the proposed route.
Do not assume the relocating parent automatically bears every cost or that the other parent must accept any proposed route. Present a specific allocation for agreement or court review.
If supervision or no-contact provisions apply, explain how travel and exchanges will comply. Distance does not remove those restrictions.
Does moving give one parent the right to choose a new school?
Review legal custody and any school-specific provisions. Relocation permission should not be treated as a blanket transfer of major decision-making authority.
Our school-choice custody guide explains why school enrollment, legal custody, and practical residence arrangements need separate attention.
How should remote contact be addressed?
A proposal can identify reasonable call times, the platform, help needed for a younger child, privacy appropriate to the child’s age, and how missed calls will be handled.
Do not present electronic contact as an automatic substitute for in-person parenting time. Explain how it complements the proposed schedule and remains consistent with any restrictions.
What if the parents agree?
Document the exact agreement and obtain advice about the required court process for revised terms. Distinguish consent to the residence move from agreement on the full parenting calendar, school decisions, and transportation costs.
Silence or a vague message such as “we will work it out” should not be treated as a complete resolution. An agreement should make clear what was approved and what remains to be decided.
What if the parents disagree?
Identify the proper request, supporting evidence, and filing and service requirements. Court jurisdiction and any prior proceedings must be reviewed rather than assuming every dispute can be filed in a newly chosen county or state.
For the parent requesting the change, explain the reasons, expected benefits, and practical plan. For the parent opposing it, identify specific effects and alternatives. Neither side should rely only on broad claims that the move is fair or unfair.
Our custody-modification forms guide helps distinguish types of requests; it is not a substitute for checking the relocation procedure in the particular case.
What should happen after a ruling?
Read the complete signed order and identify its effective terms. Confirm the authorized residence, revised schedule, travel responsibilities, and any conditions or review dates.
Do not assume that winning permission to move means every proposal was accepted. If the order leaves an important issue unclear, seek clarification before acting on an unsupported interpretation.
Frequently asked questions
Does relocation approval automatically change legal custody?
No. Read what the court actually ordered. Major decision-making authority is a separate issue.
Can we agree to the move but still disagree about travel costs?
Yes. Identify the unresolved terms and the process needed to resolve them rather than treating general consent as a complete parenting plan.
Do video calls replace missed in-person time automatically?
No. Any revised arrangement must be evaluated and authorized as required. Remote contact is not a universal substitute.
Can I use the old calendar after a long-distance move?
Review whether it remains workable and lawful. Seek appropriate revised terms rather than assuming travel conflicts excuse noncompliance.
Review the order before rewriting the family schedule
Martine Law PLLC provides family-law services under the Martine Law brand. Request a consultation with the current order, proposed move, and a draft calendar showing the requested changes.
Phones and chat are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.
This page provides general information about Minnesota law, not legal advice for your particular case.
For an overview of the law and how we help, see our Minnesota child custody and parenting time page.
