Reviewed by the Marketing Team Last updated
Yes. A threatening text or direct message can lead to a Minnesota criminal investigation or charge even when no one is physically injured. But an upsetting message is not automatically assault. The prosecution must prove the elements of the particular offense, including the required mental state. The full conversation and surrounding events matter.
How is assault different from threats of violence?
Under Minnesota Statutes 609.224, subdivision 1, fifth-degree assault includes an act intended to make another person fear immediate bodily harm or death. It also includes intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm. Physical contact is therefore not required for the fear-based form of assault.
For a message-based allegation, counsel should examine what act is alleged, what it communicated about immediate harm and the evidence of the sender’s intent. The recipient’s reaction alone does not replace those statutory requirements.
What does the threats-of-violence statute require?
Section 609.713, subdivision 1, covers direct or indirect threats to commit a crime of violence, made with a purpose to terrorize or in reckless disregard of that risk. It also addresses evacuation and serious public inconvenience. “Crime of violence” has a specific statutory definition.
Do not import assault’s immediate-harm wording into every threats-of-violence case. Nor does saying “I did not mean it” automatically resolve a charge that can involve recklessness. Counsel must evaluate the actual message, context and applicable legal standards.
Subdivision 1 carries a statutory maximum of five years in prison, a $10,000 fine, or both. Subdivisions 2 and 3 address different conduct and have different penalties. That maximum is not a prediction of the sentence in an individual case.
What if the messages involve a partner or family member?
Section 609.2242 addresses assault against a qualifying family or household member. Its basic offense includes the same intent-to-cause-fear-of-immediate-harm alternative. Relationship status and qualifying prior offenses can affect which provision applies.
Give your lawyer any existing no-contact order, protection order or release conditions. Ask what communication those documents permit before responding or arranging contact through another person. Do not assume a request to talk changes a court order.
Does calling a message a joke prevent a charge?
No label settles the issue. A lawyer should review the surrounding conversation, timing, prior exchanges and the evidence of intent or recklessness. Avoid relying on isolated examples that promise a particular phrase is always criminal or always protected. Constitutional speech issues require analysis of the actual facts and charge.
What digital evidence should be preserved?
- The full conversation, including messages before and after the disputed statement.
- Dates, timestamps, account names, phone numbers and available message details.
- Original screenshots and exports, without cropping away relevant context.
- Information showing who controlled the account or device at the relevant time.
- Related recordings, witness information and the complaint or police case number.
Keep original files and devices available for counsel’s review. Do not delete, alter or manufacture messages. A screenshot should be evaluated for completeness, authenticity and sender identity; its existence does not answer every evidentiary question. Whether additional records exist or can lawfully be obtained depends on the circumstances.
What should I ask a defense attorney?
- Which statute and subdivision am I accused of violating?
- What evidence supports the alleged sender identity and mental state?
- Does the full exchange change the meaning of the selected messages?
- Are there evidentiary, constitutional or other defenses to investigate?
- What deadlines, hearings and contact restrictions apply?
Potential consequences depend on the actual charge and circumstances. A single generic “felony assault” penalty range cannot cover every offense. Bring the charging document so counsel can identify the applicable exposure.
Contact Martine Law about a Minnesota charge
Read about Minnesota assault defense or contact Martine Law’s intake team. Your first conversation may be with a Director of Client Engagement (non-attorney), who helps with intake and scheduling and does not provide legal advice. Tell the team about your next court date and any deadline. An attorney can evaluate the evidence and possible defenses; no outcome is guaranteed.
General Minnesota legal information, not advice for a particular case.
